Estate Tax Planning Trusts: A Comprehensive Guide

The purpose of estate tax planning is to maximize the assets you pass on to future generations by minimizing gift and estate taxes. Estate-tax strategies revolve around the use of...
Read More

Tax Deferral Strategy: Comparing the Big Three

You can defer capital gain taxes with a Charitable Remainder Trust, Opportunity Zone, or Exchange Fund. CRTs get the best returns. Which is right for you?
Read More

Solar Tax Incentives vs. Oil and Gas Well Investments: A Comprehensive Comparison

Taking advantage of solar tax incentives and investing in oil and gas wells are two popular strategies for offsetting ordinary income tax. How do you know which one is right...
Read More

QSBS Stacking Options

The Qualified Small Business Stock exemption, or QSBS, is the best tax break around. As a result of Congress’s push early in the new millennium to encourage Americans to start...
Read More

How Valur Works With Advisors: A Client’s Journey

Valur can help advisors and their clients identify, understand and implement tax and estate-planning trusts to create more wealth.
Read More

Two terms that often come up in estate planning are “per stirpes” and “per capita.” Both terms describe methods that people use to divide an estate or trust amongst beneficiaries. But the terms have different meanings. This article defines these terms and explains the key differences between them.

What is Per Stirpes?

“Per stirpes” is Latin for “by branch.” When assets are divided per stirpes, that means that each branch of the family gets an equal share. For example, if a father has three children and he leaves his assets per stirpes, that means that the assets will be split into thirds so long as there’s at least one living member of each family line. If each child is then living, each child, as the representative for his or her branch of the family, would receive one-third of the assets. If one of the father’s three children (let’s call her “Anne”) predeceased the father, then Anne’s share would pass in equal shares to Anne’s two children. So each of Anne’s children would get one-sixth of the assets. The patriarch’s two surviving children would still get one-third each.

In the United States, per stirpes is the dominant approach and reflects most people’s sense of fairness. It ensures that all of a person’s children are treated the same, rather than rewarding children with larger families or punishing children with smaller families. But some people don’t like the idea of each branch of the family being treated equally. These people argue that, instead, each individual child (or grandchild) should be treated the same as all of the children (or grandchildren). These people may prefer that their assets be divided per capita.

What is Per Capita?

“Per capita” is Latin for “by head.” With a per capita distribution, each living beneficiary who belongs to a particular generation receives the same-sized share of the estate or trust as every other living member of the same generation. But members of lower generations get nothing, unless the grantor provides for those individuals separately. With a per capita division, the focus is on treating members of each generational level equally, not on treating each family line equally. So, for example, if you left your assets to your three children per capita, and one child predeceased you, the assets would pass in equal shares to your two surviving children. Any descendants of the predeceased child would be left out.

Example: Bob Leaves His Assets Per Capita

Imagine that Bob’s last will and testament provides that upon his death, his assets will be divided per capita between his two children, A and B. A has two children of her own, C and D. B doesn’t have any children. A predeceases Bob, but Bob never updates his will. Then, on Bob’s death, B, as Bob’s only surviving child, receives Bob’s entire estate. C and D receive nothing! Maybe this was Bob’s intention, but it seems like a strange result. If Bob had left his assets to his descendants per stirpes, B would have gotten one-half the assets while C and D would have gotten one-quarter each.

Per Stirpes vs. Per Capita: Main Differences

There are a few key differences between per stirpes and per capita:

  • Per stirpes divisions treat each family line equally, while per capita divisions treat each member of a particular generation equally.
  • The descendants of a predeceased child of the testator or grantor may be better off if the assets are divided per stirpes than per capita. That’s because if the assets are left per capita, and there are surviving members of the generation above those descendants (like surviving children), the surviving descendants of the predeceased child will receive nothing.
  • Per stirpes is often used in cases where there are many different people who will be getting money from the estate or trust, while per capita is more often used when there are fewer beneficiaries. Overall, per stirpes is more commonly used.

Which is Better?

There are a lot of things to consider before deciding how to divide an estate or trust. It is up to you to decide which method of division strikes you as the most fair. If the language is going to be included in a will or revocable living trust, remember that you can change the method of division in the future.

About Valur

We’ve built a platform to give everyone access to the tax and wealth-building tools typically reserved for wealthy individuals with a team of accountants and lawyers. We make it simple and seamless for our customers to take advantage of these hard-to-access tax-advantaged structures. With Valur, you can build your wealth more efficiently at less than half the cost of competitors. 

From picking the best strategy to taking care of all the setup and ongoing overhead, we make things simple. The results are real: We have helped create more than $3 billion in additional wealth for our customers. If you would like to learn more, please feel free to explore our Learning Center. You can also see your potential tax savings with our online calculators or schedule a time to chat with us!

Mani Mahadevan

Mani Mahadevan

Founder & CEO

Mani is the founder and CEO of Valur. He brings deep financial and strategic expertise from his prior roles at McKinsey & Company and Goldman Sachs. Mani earned his degree from the University of Michigan and launched Valur in 2020 to transform how individuals and advisors approach tax planning.

Read more about