Estate Tax Planning Trusts: A Comprehensive Guide

The purpose of estate tax planning is to maximize the assets you pass on to future generations by minimizing gift and estate taxes. Estate-tax strategies revolve around the use of...
Read More

Tax Deferral Strategy: Comparing the Big Three

You can defer capital gain taxes with a Charitable Remainder Trust, Opportunity Zone, or Exchange Fund. CRTs get the best returns. Which is right for you?
Read More

Solar Tax Incentives vs. Oil and Gas Well Investments: A Comprehensive Comparison

Taking advantage of solar tax incentives and investing in oil and gas wells are two popular strategies for offsetting ordinary income tax. How do you know which one is right...
Read More

QSBS Stacking Options

The Qualified Small Business Stock exemption, or QSBS, is the best tax break around. As a result of Congress’s push early in the new millennium to encourage Americans to start...
Read More

How Valur Works With Advisors: A Client’s Journey

Valur can help advisors and their clients identify, understand and implement tax and estate-planning trusts to create more wealth.
Read More

One issue that has been making waves in Washington in recent years is the taxation of carried interest. Today, the rules for taxation of investment partner compensation — and, in particular, compensation in the form of a share of investment profits, or carried interest — create a tax-savings opportunity. By taking a portion of compensation as carry, investors can convert earnings that might otherwise be ordinary income into long-term capital gains. And that makes a big difference. For a Californian or New Yorker, it could lower the effective tax rate on that income from 50% to 35%!

This may all change soon. Congress has considered reforming carried interest taxation — “closing the carried interest loophole” — many times over the years, and specific reforms even made it into an early draft of the Inflation Reduction Act that became law in 2022. So what does all this mean for investors, and particularly for the General Partners (GPs) who derive much of their income from carried interest? In this article, we discuss taxation of carried interest and how to plan for potential changes.

What Is Carried Interest?

Fund managers are often compensated in part with “carried interest” in their funds. “Carried interest” is a a type of profits interest commonly seen in private equity funds, venture capital funds, and hedge funds. It is a way for limited partners or LPs (the primary investors in investment funds) to incentivize GPs to invest in ways that generate superior risk-adjusted returns. The better an investment fund performs, the more profits GPs generate for themselves and the LPs, and the happier everyone will be.

Carried interest can be structured in a number of different ways:

  1. A “hurdle rate” is typically the most common. This is a threshold that must be met before the carried interest holder begins to receive profits. The hurdle rate is usually set at a minimum annual return that the partnership must achieve, and typically the GPs will receive 20% of the profits above that rate.
  2. Early distributions for estimated profits above the hurdle rate before the fund has fully realized its investments. This allows fund investors to receive carried interest distributions earlier on in a fund cycle instead of waiting until the fund winds down. But it’s not without risks. These funds will usually have a “clawback” provision that allows the investment fund to reclaim some or all of the GPs’ previously distributed carry if the partnership fails to meet certain performance goals.

Carried Interest Clawbacks in Practice

Let’s analyze a specific example of how a carried interest clawback might play out in practice!

Let’s say a fund is doing well in its early years, and is on track to deliver a 10% return compared to its 8% hurdle. The fund might distribute carry out to its GPs early before the fund closes. However, if by the end of the fund it has only returned 5%, the LPs may be entitled under the terms of their investment agreement to “claw back” a portion of the carry paid to the GPs to cover the shortfall when the fund sunsets. This clawback provision is a key part of the argument as to why carried interest isn’t taxed as ordinary income.

The Debate over the Income Tax Treatment of Carried Interest

Carried interest is currently treated as capital gains, which means that it is taxed at a lower rate than ordinary income. This tax treatment has become highly controversial. Some argue that it is unfair that certain fund managers are taxed at capital gains rates on income that is essentially compensatory in nature. Opponents of the current tax treatment argue that carried interest should be taxed as ordinary income. However, supporters argue that this tax treatment encourages investment, which in turn spurs economic growth. Further, supporters argue that the classification of carried interest as capital gains is not a loophole, because investors with carried interest are taking on real risk.

The debate over carried interest is likely to continue in the years ahead, as lawmakers seek ways to reduce the federal deficit and pay for other priorities. We’ve even seen prominent firms like Sequoia Capital change their fund structures and distribution plans to mitigate the risk of higher taxes from potential legislative changes.

Will Carried Interest Get Taxed as Ordinary Income?

The so-called carried interest loophole has been a political hot topic since 2007, and legislation that would increase the tax rates on carried interest has been on the brink of passage multiple times since then, including this year. In 2017, as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Congress raised the threshold for qualifying as carried interest. The case for further tightening these rules is primarily about optics: it’s good politics to say that you’ve increased taxes on wealthy fund managers and passed the revenue on to another, more needy constituency.

So why hasn’t Congress changed these rules? Two reasons:

  1. The tax savings at stake are fairly small — about $15 billion in additional revenue, or about 0.3% of the $5 trillion federal budget.
  2. Professional investors are a small but politically powerful interest group.

At the same time, the political winds are changing. Efforts at progressive redistribution have been successful since the Democrats took power — witness the recent federal student loan forgiveness — and carried interest reform has gotten more positive press in the latest debates in Congress. With those developments in mind, it’s smart to plan for a world in which the tax treatment of carried interest becomes less favorable.

What Can Firms Do to Reduce Taxes on Carry if Legislation Passes?

Proactive firms have pursued a couple of solutions that are worth considering.

Preemptively distributing shares from existing investments to SPVs

The most effective way to get ahead of potential reforms is to distribute carry before any rule changes come into effect, so that the distributions will be taxed under the current rules. It’s not typically possible to distribute proceeds before they’re liquid, but some firms have come up with a clever solution. By distributing fund investments to a new SPV now, the distributions may be taxed as long-term capital gains under the current rules, even if the carried interest rules change in the future.

To be sure, distributing carry proceeds to an SPV can create a taxable event today, whereas waiting for later distributions allows you to defer the gains. The tax rate could be lower, but this is a trade-off that may or may not make sense depending on the size of the expected gain and your liquidity timeline. The greater the asset appreciation that is expected to happen after carried interest reforms, the more valuable this option may be.

This isn’t an option that’s necessary to implement today; a firm can choose to take this step if and when the carried interest rules change. But it is worth noting that firms like Sequoia are starting to make precisely these plans.

Early LP and GP distributions

Preemptive distribution of shares requires serious foresight. It’s not worth doing unless the taxation of carried interest changes, and once reform legislation is approved, it’ll be too late.

There is, however, another strategy for reducing the tax on carry even after any reform is enacted: Early distribution of investment proceeds. Typically, GPs wait to distribute the proceeds from an investment until there is a liquidity event, like an acquisition or IPO. If the carried interest loophole closes, though, we may see LPs and GPs begin taking distributions earlier. Distributing shares earlier enables all of the post-distribution appreciation to be tax as capital gains, while simultaneously limiting the ordinary income tax exposure to the initial distribution value. It will incentivize firms to distribute shares when the shares have a lower value (and therefore a lower cost basis for the purpose of capital gains taxation).

The challenge with distributing shares early is estimating the exit value of these investments and correctly allocating the profits to LPs and GPs. While clawback provisions can help, they are unlikely to work for investment firms without long relationships with their LPs.

Tax Savings Opportunities For Carried Interest

In the meantime, there are a number of ways that investors can save money on their carried interest taxes simply by taking advantage of carried interest’s structure. All of these typically center around transferring the carried interest out of your name when a new fund is formed, in order to take advantage of carry’s low cost basis before any investments have been made. The solution typically depends on where you live and if you are focused on income tax planning or estate tax planning.

  • Estate Tax Planning (for individuals currently focused on maximizing the assets they pass on to future generations): To avoid estate taxes and generation skipping taxes, wealthy investors often gift their carried interest to irrevocable dynasty trusts. The carried interest will be at a relatively low value when the fund is formed, so typically this planning will take place soon thereafter in order to achieve maximum benefit by minimizing estate taxes.
  • Income Tax Planning (for individuals currently focused on the assets they will be able to use): To avoid state taxes, which in New York and California can run north of 13%, investors often use what is called a non-grantor trust to shift ownership of their carried interest to a trust based in a no-tax state, such as South Dakota, so they can avoid state taxes on their carry proceeds.

Sometimes fund principals have the investment fund distribute shares of the underlying investments (instead of the proceeds of the sale of those assets) to the fund principals. It gives you more flexibility to take advantage of more tax-advantaged planning, like QSBS stacking and Charitable Remainder Trusts, among other options.

About Valur

We’ve built a platform to give everyone access to the tax and wealth-building tools typically reserved for wealthy individuals with a team of accountants and lawyers. We make it simple and seamless for our customers to take advantage of these hard-to-access tax-advantaged structures. With Valur, you can build your wealth more efficiently at less than half the cost of competitors. 

From picking the best strategy to taking care of all the setup and ongoing overhead, we make things simple. The results are real: We have helped create more than $3 billion in additional wealth for our customers. If you would like to learn more, please feel free to explore our Learning Center. You can also see your potential tax savings with our online calculators or schedule a time to chat with us!

Mani Mahadevan

Mani Mahadevan

Founder & CEO

Mani is the founder and CEO of Valur. He brings deep financial and strategic expertise from his prior roles at McKinsey & Company and Goldman Sachs. Mani earned his degree from the University of Michigan and launched Valur in 2020 to transform how individuals and advisors approach tax planning.

Read more about